

TL;DR:
Industry benchmarks for ecommerce are hard to come by. Most of what's out there is self-reported, survey-based, or too aggregated to be usable. Teams are left wondering whether their AI adoption is on par with industry standards or if their response times are costing them revenue.
That's a gap we're in a unique position to close.
Gorgias processes millions of customer conversations across thousands of ecommerce brands every day. This has given us a rare, unfiltered view into how the industry operates. But until now, we’ve kept those insights largely internal.
Today, we're making it public with the Ecom Lab.
The result is years of first-party data from thousands of ecommerce brands, packaged into findings that give teams a real foundation to build their strategy on.
The Ecom Lab is Gorgias's public research hub for ecommerce. It publishes insights and reports on AI adoption, support performance, financial impact, and industry trends.
The goal is simple: give teams a real baseline to measure against and to uncover the industry's inner workings.
Metrics that actually move decisions.
The Ecom Lab publishes metrics that matter to ecommerce professionals, including AI adoption rates, first response times, CSAT scores, conversion rates, and ticket intents, all broken down by brand size, GMV tier, and industry vertical.
For the first time, teams can see exactly where they stand in comparison to the broader market.
AI is Everywhere reveals why roughly 4 in 5 ecommerce brands still haven't deployed AI in customer-facing support.
Stop Benchmarking Against the Average argues that support teams should benchmark response times against their specific industry vertical rather than the overall average.
Most Brands are Overpaying for Support breaks down the actual cost of support ticket volume and what happens when AI handles the load.
Four months ago, our analysts were dealing with a barrage of questions. "What's our ARR by segment?" "Build me a dashboard for this quarter's pipeline." Quick asks piled up behind complex deep dives. Stakeholders waited for answers that should have taken seconds, and analysts spent their time fielding requests instead of doing the strategic work that creates the most value.
Today, anyone at Gorgias can ask a question in plain language and get an accurate, contextualized response in seconds. Not from a colleague or dashboard, nor from a generic answer from the internet. But a response built on our business context. We call it Cortex, our flagship internal AI agent.
In two months, Cortex went from an idea to fielding thousands of questions every week, recommending actions across the business, and deprecating the need for manual dashboard creation. While most companies right now are treating AI as an initiative — at Gorgias, AI is already part of how we work. 72% of Gorgias employees use Cortex each week, and that number is only growing.
We didn’t achieve this by simply plugging a large language model into our stack. LLMs are a critical part of the equation, but they aren't the driving force — it’s everything else under the hood: the infrastructure, context, platform architecture, and the team that brings it all together.

The instinct across many companies today is to start with the model, pick a provider to solve a specific challenge, or invest heavily in getting the data right. All reasonable starting points, but most of them solve for one use case. Underneath that approach is a framing problem: seeing AI as an initiative — something you assign and measure. Seeing AI as another tool your company uses versus how your company operates.
We started somewhere different. Every company is built on four pillars: customers, people, product, and decisions. AI investments tend to place heavy emphasis on the first three. We started with the fourth. Our bet was that if we built everything around the need to make effective decisions first, asking what Gorgias needed to know to operate well, then our AI would become dramatically more powerful.
Cortex is our flagship internal AI agent, and the product where we established the tenets that now run through everything else we build: composable and modular infrastructure, governed context, and accessible from wherever decisions happen. Cortex lives in Slack, as well as across LLM vendors, in its own browser extension, and even on its own dedicated internal site.
Cortex doesn’t stop at answering questions. It can read and write to Notion, file Linear tasks, create HTML apps, automate signal delivery, and more. It operates across every layer of our stack, from dashboards to data pipelines, because we designed it as one integrated system. It is this connection that adds remarkable depth to what people can ask, and what they get in return.

A Sales Lead is pitching and asks Cortex for the full picture of the merchant. In a customized PDF, Cortex lists coverage gaps, pre-sale intent signals, and product fit options. Everything the sales lead needs to walk in with confidence.
A Senior Product leader asks, "How are we performing against OKR #1, and what can my team do to help accelerate it?" Cortex returns a full ARR breakdown, projected end-of-month attainment, segment-level findings, and connects it all back to company-level strategies. A suite of recommendations customized to the leader, the performance, and the signals that bridge how they can support our goals. The kind of answer that used to take someone a week to put together.
These aren't simple lookup queries. They require deep business context spanning multiple areas. Cortex handles these because its Decision Engine gives it the information to reason against governed data, metric definitions, and business context, turning a generic answer into a credible one.
Overnight, teams have built Cortex into how they work. They’re spending less time searching and more time finding answers, not because they were told to, but because Cortex reduced the distance between question and decision.
Cortex’s modular infrastructure allows us to experiment and add new capabilities freely. We’ve already built two more internal AI agents made for entirely different use cases, but using the same Decision Engine as Cortex.
GAIA, our internal experimentation AI Agent, helps our customers identify opportunities in their AI Agent Guidance design. It takes institutional knowledge across our teams and turns it into a scalable system that drives automation and value to our customers. Our CEO, Romain Lapeyre, has been its most vocal advocate since day one.
When we needed a platform for investor readiness and board preparation, we built Oracle. Our board decks and talk tracks are informed and built with the same AI, and our numbers are validated every step of the way.
We’re continuing to expand new AI agents internally, exploring how they can create value for customers and our own teams.
When AI handles thousands of analytical questions each week, the highest-value work for a data team shifts permanently. Late 2025, we repositioned from a Data Analytics function into a Decision Intelligence function — a structural change in what we own and how we operate.
Today, our analysts focus on the most sensitive, complex, and forward-looking decisions and analyses. They partner more deeply with stakeholders by driving next steps from signals. They're even building entirely new capabilities that didn't exist in their role descriptions months ago. Things like AI skills for Cortex, context curation, and insight and recommendation delivery. The role of the analyst hasn't diminished. It's expanded to encompass the most meaningful work an analyst can do: driving outcomes and ensuring those decisions can achieve them.

Our business support model has changed, too. Instead of embedding analysts and dedicated engineers within functional teams, we align capacity to the highest-impact company objectives and move fluidly across them. This model works even better because Decision Intelligence brings together both analytics and engineering teams under one roof.
Elliot Trabac leads our Data, Context and AI Engineering teams. The Decision Engine, Cortex, GAIA, and the platforms I've described exist because of the infrastructure his team innovated and built from the ground up. Noemie Happi Nono leads our Decision Strategy and Operations team, driving decision outcomes with stakeholders, advancing the development of Cortex skills and capabilities, and pushing into new areas of analysis every day.
Together, they're shaping what a modern data function looks like when AI becomes a standard building block for how a company operates.
The question of ROI is long gone. AI has opened the floodgates to more trusted and meaningful signals than ever. The natural next evolution is Proactive Intelligence, signals surfaced toward what you need to know, before you ask. And we're already building this because our architecture is designed to support it.
In the coming weeks, members of the Decision Intelligence team will go deeper into themes I've touched on here. Yochan Khoi, a Senior Analytics Engineer on our team, recently published a technical walkthrough of our context layer and will go further into building context strategies that scale. Others will cover infrastructure, analytical partnerships, evolving data assets into decision assets, and the cost and efficiency gains that make sustained AI investment viable.
AI hasn't changed the most important element of data and analytics functions — delivering outcomes — but it has raised the bar for what it looks like and how far we can take it. We’re just getting started.
The best in CX and ecommerce, right to your inbox

TL;DR:
The page-based shopping experience dominated for decades. Customers would search, browse, compare, abandon, get retargeted, return, and eventually buy (sometimes).
That journey is no longer the only option.
Shoppers are turning to chat, messaging, and AI-powered tools to find what they need. Instead of clicking through product pages or reading static FAQs, they ask questions, have back-and-forth conversations, and get answers that move them closer to a purchase in real time. The path to checkout has changed, and the brands that recognize this are pulling ahead.
Read our 2026 State of Conversational Commerce Report to learn more about conversation commerce trends from 400 ecommerce decision-makers and 16,000+ ecommerce brands using Gorgias.
{{lead-magnet-1}}
The traditional shopping journey was a solo experience. A shopper had a need, searched for options, browsed across sessions, and eventually made a decision — often days later, after being retargeted multiple times. Support only entered the picture after the purchase.

The conversation-led journey collapses that timeline:
What used to take days now takes minutes. Discovery, evaluation, and purchase happen in a single thread.
79% of brands agree that AI-driven conversational commerce has increased sales and purchase rates in their business. When brands were asked to rank the highest-return areas:
Those numbers reflect something important: the value of conversation compounds. Faster support reduces friction. Better retention raises lifetime value. More confident shoppers buy more often and spend more per order.
The brands seeing the biggest returns aren't just using AI to deflect tickets. They're using it to create one-to-one shopping experiences at scale.
Looking at AI-only influenced orders across key verticals like Apparel and Accessories, Food and Beverages, Health and Beauty, Home and Garden, and Sporting Goods, the growth across a single year was significant.





Across industries, ecommerce brands saw AI step into conversations, reduce shopper hesitation, and drive higher QoQ conversion rates.
Learn more about AI-powered revenue generation in the full 2026 Conversational Commerce Report.
84% of brands say the strategic importance of conversational commerce is higher than it was a year ago. 82% agree it will be mainstream in their sector within two years.

That shift is registering at the leadership level because of what conversational commerce does to the buying experience. Creating one-to-one touchpoints earlier in the journey drives higher AOV, shorter buying cycles, and stronger purchase rates. Shoppers who get real-time answers to their questions are more confident.
TUSHY, known for eco-friendly bidets and bathroom essentials, is a useful example of what happens when you take conversational commerce seriously.
Bidets aren't an impulse purchase. Shoppers have real questions about fit, compatibility, and installation. Those questions used to go unanswered until the CX team could respond, often after the customer had abandoned the cart.
TUSHY used Gorgias's AI Agent and shopping assistant capabilities to automate pre-sales support. AI Agent engaged shoppers in real-time conversations, addressed their concerns directly, and built confidence at the moment of highest intent.
This resulted in a 190% increase in chat-based purchases, a 13x return on investment, and twice the purchase rate of human agents.
You don't need to overhaul your entire operation to start seeing results. The most effective approach is to start where the impact is clearest and expand from there.
A few places to begin:
Want to see the full picture of where conversational commerce is headed in 2026? Read the full report to explore the data, trends, and strategies shaping the next era of ecommerce.
{{lead-magnet-1}}

TL;DR:
A year ago, ecommerce brands were still debating whether AI was worth the investment. That debate is over. Today, nearly every ecommerce professional uses AI to do their job.
The shift isn't just about adoption. It's about what AI is used for and how brands measure its impact. Support automation was the entry point. Now, AI is embedded across the full operation, from product recommendations to inventory control to real-time shopping conversations.
In our 2026 State of Conversational Commerce Report, we break down trends on AI usage among 400 ecommerce decision-makers and 16,000+ ecommerce brands using Gorgias.
{{lead-magnet-1}}
If we rewind 12 months ago, the industry was still split on AI. Some ecommerce professionals were excited, but most were still hesitant. In 2024, 69% of ecommerce professionals used AI in their roles. By 2025, that number reached 77%. In 2026, it hit 96%.

The confidence numbers back it up. 71% of brands say they are confident using AI for ecommerce, and 73% are satisfied with its business impact.
In early 2025, only 30% of ecommerce professionals rated their excitement for AI at 10/10. Today, zero percent of respondents describe themselves as hesitant about AI.

Using AI in ecommerce is not new. In fact, it dates back to the 1980s with the invention of algorithms and expert systems. And if you’ve ever leveraged similar product recommendations or chatbots, you’ve already integrated AI into your ecommerce stack.
Modern AI is far more sophisticated.
With the rise of agentic commerce and conversational AI, brands began leveraging AI agents to automate the processing of repetitive support tickets. That’s still happening today, but the scope has expanded beyond the support queue.

Ecommerce brands are deploying AI across every layer of their operation:
When brands were asked which channels contribute most to their AI success, conversational channels dominated. Social media messaging led at 78%, followed by SMS at 70%, and website live chat at 51%. Shoppers want fast, personal conversations, and AI is the best way to deliver that at scale.
Learn more about AI adoption, perception, and use case trends in the full 2026 Conversational Commerce Report.
For decades, customer support success meant fast response times and high satisfaction scores. Those are still important indicators of success, but leading brands are adding revenue-focused metrics to their dashboards.
91% of brands still track CSAT as a measure of AI's impact. But 60% now include AOV as a top indicator, and higher-revenue brands earning $20M+ are focusing on metrics like total operating expenses, cost per resolution, incremental revenue, and one-touch ticket rate.

AI can now start a conversation, ease customer doubts, sell, upsell, and recover abandoned carts in a single conversation. When you’re only measuring CSAT, you’re ignoring the real ROI of conversational AI investment.
Virtual shopping assistants now proactively engage shoppers, adapt to their needs in real time, and offer contextual product recommendations and upsells. When the moment calls for it, they can close the deal with a targeted discount.
Gorgias brands using AI Agent's shopping assistant capabilities nearly doubled their purchase rates and converted 20–50% better than those using AI Agent for support only.
Orthofeet, the largest provider of orthopedic footwear in the US, is a concrete example of this in practice. Using Gorgias, they achieved:
The data tells a clear story: AI has evolved beyond a tool for handling tier 1 support tickets. It’s a core part of your revenue generation strategy.
57% of brands are already using AI for 26–50% of all customer interactions, and 37% expect that share to rise to 51–75% within the next two years. The brands building toward that range now are the ones who will have the operational advantage when it matters most.
The practical question isn't whether to invest in AI. It's where to focus first. Based on where brands are seeing the most impact, three priorities stand out:
Want to go deeper on the full 2026 conversational commerce trends? Read the complete report for data across every major AI use case in ecommerce.
{{lead-magnet-1}}

TL;DR:
The way shoppers buy online has shifted and customers are at the center.
They no longer want to scroll through product pages, dig through FAQs, or wait 24 hours for an email reply. They open a conversation, ask a specific question, and expect a useful answer in seconds. Brands that can’t deliver these experiences at scale are seeing customer hesitation turn into abandoned carts and lost revenue.
This shift has a name: conversational commerce. It's the practice of using real-time, two-way conversations as your primary sales channel, through chat, AI agents, messaging apps, and voice.
What started as an experiment for early adopters has become a key growth lever, with 84% of ecommerce brands treating conversational commerce as a strategic pillar this year vs. last year.

We surveyed 400 ecommerce decision-makers across North America, the U.K., and Europe to understand how conversational commerce and AI are reshaping the ecommerce landscape. These findings are complemented by aggregated and anonymized internal Gorgias platform data from 16,000+ ecommerce brands.
The State of Conversational Commerce in 2026 trends report breaks down all of the findings, including five key trends shaping the ecommerce landscape.
{{lead-magnet-1}}
A few years ago, adding an AI chatbot to your site that could provide tracking links and Help Center article recommendations was a differentiator. Today, it's table stakes. McKinsey found that 71% of shoppers expect personalized experiences, and 76% get frustrated when they don't get them.
Right now, most ecommerce professionals use AI, with 93% having used it for at least 1 year. Enthusiasm is accelerating quickly, with only 30% of ecommerce professionals rating their excitement for AI at 10/10 in April 2025. Similarly, while AI adoption rose steadily year over year, it reached a clear peak in 2026.

The use cases driving this adoption are practical and high-volume:

These are the tickets that flood brands’ inboxes every day. AI agents resolve them instantly, without pulling teams away from conversations that actually require human judgment.
Explore AI adoption and use case data in more depth in the full report.
The traditional ecommerce funnel, visit site, browse products, add to cart, check out, is losing ground. Shoppers now discover products on Instagram, ask questions via direct message, and complete purchases without ever visiting a website.

Conversational AI is actively increasing revenue, with 79% of brands reporting that AI-driven interactions have increased sales and conversion in their business.

The practical implication is that every channel is becoming a storefront. Creating personalized touchpoints with customers earlier in the journey, through proactive engagement, is impacting the bottom line.
Read the full report to explore how AI conversions have increased QoQ by industry.
Pre-purchase hesitation is one of the biggest conversion killers in ecommerce. A shopper lands on your product page, has a question about sizing or compatibility, can't find the answer quickly, and leaves. That's a lost sale that had nothing to do with your product.
Conversational AI changes that dynamic. When a shopper can ask a question and get an accurate, personalized answer in real time, the friction disappears.
Brands using Gorgias saw this play out at scale in 2025. When AI Agent recommended a product, 80% of the resulting purchases happened the same day, and 13% happened the next day.

Brands are further accelerating the buying cycle through proactive engagement. On-site features such as suggested product questions, recommendations triggered by search results, and “Ask Anything” input bars drove 50% of conversation-driven purchases during BFCM 2025.
Explore how AI is collapsing the purchase cycle in Trend 3 of the report.
There's a persistent narrative that AI is making CX teams redundant. The data tells a different story. 62% of ecommerce brands are planning to grow their teams, not cut them. But the scope of those teams is changing.

New roles are emerging around AI configuration and quality assurance. Teams are investing in technical members to write AI Guidance instructions, develop tone-of-voice instructions, and continuously QA results.
CX teams are also bridging the gap between support goals and revenue goals, as the two functions increasingly overlap.

The result is CX teams that are more technical than they were before. Agents who once spent their days answering repetitive tickets are now spending that time on higher-value work: complex escalations, VIP customer relationships, and improving the AI systems and knowledge bases that handle the volume.
Learn more about the evolution of CX roles in Trend #4.
Despite increasing AI adoption, data shows that ecommerce brands shouldn’t strive for 100% automation. Winning brands are building systems in which AI handles repetitive tier-1 tickets, and humans handle complex, sensitive cases.

AI handles speed and scale. It resolves order-tracking requests at 2 a.m., processes return-eligibility checks in seconds, and answers the same shipping question for the thousandth time without compromising quality.
Human agents handle conversations that require context, empathy, or decisions that fall outside the standard playbook. There are several topics where shoppers still prefer human support.

Successful hybrid systems require continuous iteration, meaning reviewing handover topics, Guidance, and reviewing AI tickets on a weekly basis.
Discover how leading brands are balancing human and AI systems in Trend #5.
The 2026 trends are about expansion and standardization. The 2030 predictions are about what comes next.

Voice-based purchasing is the biggest bet on the horizon. Only 7% of brands currently use voice assistants for commerce, but 89% expect it to be standard by 2030. The vision is a customer who can reorder a product, check their subscription status, or manage a return entirely over the phone.
Proactive AI is the other major shift. Rather than waiting for a customer to reach out, AI will anticipate needs based on browsing behavior, purchase history, and where someone is in their relationship with your brand. Think of it as the digital equivalent of a sales associate who remembers what you bought last time and knows what you're likely to need next.
Explore where ecommerce brands are allocating their AI budgets in the full report.
The brands winning in 2026 are creating smart, scalable systems where AIhandles volume and humans handle nuance. They’re treating every conversational channel as an opportunity to serve and sell.
The data is clear: AI adoption is accelerating, customer expectations are rising, and the revenue impact of getting this right is measurable.
{{lead-magnet-1}}

TL;DR:
If you're evaluating Help Scout, you're likely wondering how it stacks up against AI-powered alternatives built for ecommerce.
We reviewed G2 and Capterra reviews, along with competitive analyses, to answer that question.
Help Scout remains a strong choice for email-first support teams, but its limited multichannel automation and analytics depth may not serve high-volume ecommerce brands.
This review covers Help Scout's core strengths, known limitations, and five alternatives that prioritize conversational AI and revenue-driving support. By the end, you'll know whether Help Scout fits your team or if an alternative is the way to go.
{{lead-magnet-1}}
Help Scout is a shared inbox platform built for email-first support teams. It uses a Gmail-like interface instead of numbered tickets, built around three core components:
G2 reviewers consistently praise its clean UI, collision detection, and saved replies. AI features including Drafts, Summarize, and Assist are included in paid plans at no extra cost.
The consensus: Help Scout delivers on simplicity but sacrifices automation depth and multichannel sophistication. It positions itself as a relationship-building platform rather than a traditional helpdesk without overwhelming configuration.
Help Scout has usage-based pricing, charging per user with unlimited contacts (customers that receive your replies).
Plan breakdown:
AI features (Drafts, Summarize, Assist) are included in all paid plans at no extra cost, a notable advantage over Intercom's Fin AI (separate add-on pricing) or Zendesk's Advanced AI (requires higher tiers).
Compared to competitors: Help Scout's Standard plan at $25/user is cheaper than Zendesk Suite Team ($55/agent/month) but more expensive than Freshdesk Growth ($18/agent/month).
The value depends on your contact volume — teams supporting 1,000+ contacts/month may find per-contact pricing less favorable than per-agent models.
Note: All plans include a 15-day free trial with no credit card required.
Jump to a feature:
Help Scout's shared inbox replaces traditional ticket numbers with conversation threads that look like email. The interface supports:
For ecommerce teams: Inbox management works well for email-dominant workflows but lacks omnichannel depth of the top helpdesk solutions out there.
Help Scout offers workflows for conditional automation (if/then logic) and AI features to accelerate responses:
Help Scout's Docs knowledge base and Beacon widget enable customer self-service:
Competitor comparison: Note that Beacon works for static FAQ content but doesn't integrate with Shopify for dynamic order tracking or personalized product recommendations like Gorgias’s Shopping Assistant.
Help Scout provides productivity metrics and customer satisfaction (CSAT) tracking, with known limitations in analytics depth:
Competitor comparison: Custom reporting is less flexible than Zendesk Explore or Gorgias's revenue statistics (which track sales from support, conversion rate, and total sales attributed to support).
Reviewers on G2 and Capterra consistently rate Help Scout 4.5+/5 for ease of use, citing the clean conversation view and familiar email-like interface as key strengths. The dashboard prominently surfaces unassigned conversations, with filtering options that update without needing to refresh the page.
UX highlights from user reviews:
Competitor comparison: Help Scout works out-of-the-box with minimal setup, unlike Zendesk, which requires configuration of Views, triggers, and automations before use. New agents typically onboard in under an hour.
Teams familiar with Gmail may experience a brief learning curve around Help Scout's unique terminology, such as conversations vs. tickets, saved replies vs. canned responses.
Help Scout emphasizes no dev support required for setup and migration, contrasting with Zendesk's partner marketplace dependency. The onboarding process involves:
Help Scout is partnered with Import2, allowing users to import their data from another platform for free. Import2 transfers conversations, customers, and attachments while preserving timestamps and agent assignments. The migration typically completes within 48-72 hours.
Setup steps for email forwarding:
Note: Some reviewers find the email forwarding setup time-consuming compared to IMAP-based systems. Initial configuration requires touching each team member's email account.
Help Scout offers 80+ native integrations and a REST API for custom connections:
Key integrations for ecommerce teams:
REST API is available on all paid plans, with webhooks for real-time event notifications. Developers can build custom apps using the Beacon SDK (JavaScript API for widget customization) or Chrome extension API (for browser-based integrations).
Competitor comparison: Unlike Gorgias's native Shopify integration (which enables order editing, subscription management, and revenue attribution directly from the helpdesk), Help Scout's Shopify integration requires third-party apps and only surfaces basic order data. Ecommerce teams needing deeper platform integration should evaluate alternatives.
Help Scout offers mobile apps for iOS and Android, enabling on-the-go replies and basic inbox management:
Reviewers note the mobile app is functional for basic support but lacks the full feature set of the desktop interface.
Help Scout maintains a 99.99% uptime SLA, with transparent incident reporting via their public status page. The platform has experienced minimal downtime in recent years, with most incidents resolved within 30 minutes.
Performance highlights:
Help Scout provides productivity metrics and CSAT tracking, but reviewers consistently note gaps in custom reporting depth and analytics accuracy.
Reporting categories:
Competitor comparison: Custom reporting lacks the flexibility of Zendesk Explore or Gorgias's revenue statistics, which track sales from support, conversion rate, and total sales attributed to support interactions.
For ecommerce teams prioritizing revenue attribution and custom analytics, Help Scout's reporting may feel limiting compared to alternatives.
Help Scout consistently earns praise for support quality, with a G2 rating of 9.1/10 for customer service — higher than Zendesk (8.5/10) and Freshdesk (8.7/10):
Support channels and resources:
Competitor comparison: Help Scout includes email and chat support for all paid customers, compared to Zendesk which restricts phone support and faster SLAs to enterprise plans. Plus, the Help Scout support team uses Help Scout themselves, demonstrating product expertise and empathy for customer workflows.
Help Scout serves SMBs, SaaS support teams, and email-first organizations that prioritize simplicity over enterprise-scale automation:
|
Ideal for |
Not ideal for |
|---|---|
|
SMBs and startups with 5-50 agents managing primarily email support |
High-volume ecommerce brands handling 1,000+ tickets/day across multiple channels |
|
SaaS support teams needing shared inbox and knowledge base without Zendesk's complexity |
Data-driven teams requiring revenue attribution, custom reporting, and advanced analytics |
|
Email-first organizations where 70%+ of inquiries arrive via email with limited social or SMS volume |
Enterprise organizations needing complex routing, SLA management, and multi-brand support |
If you're running a high-volume ecommerce operation with multichannel support needs, the next section compares Help Scout to AI-powered alternatives purpose-built for online retail.
The table below compares Help Scout to five alternatives prioritizing AI automation, multichannel support, and ecommerce integrations. Gorgias (highlighted) is purpose-built for ecommerce, with native Shopify sync and conversational commerce features Help Scout lacks.
Platform |
Pricing Model |
AI Automation |
Multichannel Support |
Ecommerce Integrations |
Analytics Depth |
Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Help Scout | Per user, unlimited users | AI Drafts, AI Summarize, AI Assist (agent-reviewed) | Email, chat (Beacon), phone (third-party) | Shopify (basic, third-party app) | Productivity metrics, CSAT (limited custom reporting) | SMBs, SaaS, email-first teams |
| Gorgias | Per ticket (50–3,000+) | AI Agent (autonomous), Shopping Assistant, automation Rules, Macros | Email, chat, SMS, social (unified inbox) | Shopify (native two-way sync), BigCommerce, Magento | Revenue statistics, conversion tracking, custom reports | Ecommerce brands, Shopify merchants, high-volume support |
| Zendesk | Per agent (Suite tiers) | Advanced AI (higher tiers), bots, triggers | Email, chat, phone, social, messaging | Shopify (Marketplace app), 1,000+ integrations | Zendesk Explore (custom dashboards, advanced analytics) | Enterprises, complex routing, multi-brand |
| Intercom | Per seat + Fin AI add-on | Fin AI (paid add-on), Resolution Bot, product tours | Chat, email, in-app messaging | Shopify (basic), HubSpot, Salesforce | Custom reports, conversation analytics | Product-led growth, chat-first SaaS |
| Freshdesk | Per agent (tiered) | Freddy AI (basic), canned responses, automations | Email, chat, phone, social | Shopify (Marketplace), Zapier integrations | Analytics dashboard, custom reports (higher tiers) | Budget-conscious SMBs, ticketing-focused teams |
| Tidio | Per operator + Lyro AI add-on | Lyro AI (conversational chatbot), triggers, automations | Chat, email, Messenger, Instagram | Shopify (native), WooCommerce, BigCommerce | Basic analytics, Lyro conversation insights | Small ecommerce stores, chat-first support |
We ranked these alternatives based on AI automation depth, multichannel support, ecommerce platform integration, and total cost of ownership for high-volume online retailers. Gorgias tops the list as the only platform purpose-built for ecommerce conversational commerce.
Gorgias is an ecommerce-first helpdesk that treats customer support as a revenue channel, not a cost center. Unlike Help Scout's shared inbox model, Gorgias unifies all customer interactions in a single thread per customer, with native Shopify sync that enables order editing, subscription management, and revenue attribution directly from the helpdesk.
The platform's AI Agent autonomously resolves common ecommerce questions without agent intervention, handling 20-60% of repetitive inquiries for brands like Obvi and Steve Madden. Its Shopping Assistant combines live chat with product recommendations, enabling customers to browse, ask questions, and complete purchases without leaving the conversation.
Compared to Help Scout's agent-reviewed AI Drafts, Gorgias's AI Agent takes action automatically — canceling orders, updating addresses, processing returns — based on your store's policies.
Main features:
Ideal for:
Pricing:
Are you a Help Scout user looking to switch? Join Gorgias's buyout program to get full access to premium features and migrate your data with dedicated support.
Zendesk Suite is the enterprise standard for helpdesk software, offering deep customization, advanced routing, SLA management, and multi-brand support. It serves Fortune 500 companies and high-complexity support operations that Help Scout's simplicity can't accommodate.
The platform provides granular control over ticket workflows, with triggers, automations, and macros that power sophisticated routing rules. Zendesk Explore (analytics) offers custom dashboards and historical trend analysis that far exceed Help Scout's reporting depth. However, this power comes with complexity — new users often require days or weeks of training, and implementation typically involves Zendesk partners or internal developers.
Compared to Help Scout: Zendesk is overkill for small teams but necessary for enterprises managing multiple brands, languages, and SLA tiers across thousands of agents.
Main features:
Ideal for:
Pricing:
Intercom is a chat-first platform designed for product-led growth companies that prioritize in-app messaging, product tours, and proactive engagement. It's ideal for SaaS teams supporting logged-in users but less suited for ecommerce brands managing anonymous shoppers across email, SMS, and social.
The platform's Resolution Bot and Fin AI (paid add-on) handle common questions conversationally, with escalation to human agents when needed. Product tours and targeted messages drive onboarding and feature adoption — use cases Help Scout doesn't address. However, Intercom's pricing is among the highest in the category, with seat-based fees plus separate charges for Fin AI.
Compared to Help Scout: Intercom offers deeper product engagement tools but costs 2-3x more and focuses on chat over email.
Main features:
Ideal for:
Pricing:
Freshdesk is an affordable ticketing system for budget-conscious SMBs that need multichannel support without enterprise pricing. It offers email, chat, phone, and social in a single platform, with basic AI (Freddy AI) and automations included at lower price points than Zendesk or Help Scout.
The platform's strength is value — teams get essential ticketing features (assignment, SLA, canned responses, reporting) starting at $15/agent/month. However, support quality and product polish lag Help Scout's highly-rated customer service and clean interface. Reviewers note Freddy AI is less sophisticated than Gorgias's AI Agent or Intercom's Fin, handling only simple keyword-based routing.
Compared to Help Scout: Freshdesk is cheaper but sacrifices support quality, ease of use, and AI sophistication.
Main features:
Ideal for:
Pricing:
Tidio is a chat-first platform for small ecommerce stores, with Lyro AI (conversational chatbot) and native Shopify integration. It's designed for solo operators and teams under 10 agents who want automated chat support without Help Scout's email-focused complexity.
Lyro AI handles common ecommerce questions (order tracking, return policies, product questions) conversationally, with accuracy comparable to Gorgias's AI Agent for basic scenarios. The platform integrates natively with Shopify, WooCommerce, and BigCommerce, displaying order data in the chat widget. However, Tidio lacks the omnichannel depth, automation Rules, and revenue analytics of Gorgias — it's a chat widget, not a full helpdesk.
Compared to Help Scout: Tidio is cheaper and easier to set up but limited to chat and basic email (no phone, SMS, or advanced social integrations).
Main features:
Ideal for:
Pricing:
Help Scout suits small teams handling email support primarily. But weak multichannel automation, shallow Shopify integration, and no revenue attribution may create more work for support teams.
Ecommerce brands that want more should consider Gorgias. Its AI Agent autonomously resolves up to 60% of repetitive tickets, Shopping Assistant enables product discovery and checkout within conversations, and native Shopify sync offers two-way order management Help Scout can't match.
Book a demo to see how Gorgias works with your store's data, or join the buyout program to migrate from Help Scout with full access to premium features.
{{lead-magnet-2}}

You might be assuming that there’s really nothing you can do to change this outside of overworking your team, or hiring more people.
This is completely normal, but there’s no need to panic. That’s because with Gorgias you can now integrate Loop in your ecommerce store. In case you’re wondering, Loop is an on-demand portal that allows customers to get the product they want, with less support touchpoints.
Using Loop, there are many ways you can reduce one of the biggest and more time-consuming support-related requests… returns. Plus, they do this while still giving your customers a seamless experience.
So, let’s dive in.
Did you know that 40% of support tickets are order related, with 5% being about returns? It might not seem like something worth looking into, or too problematic, but it is.
Though these customers returning items do deserve a great level of customer care (everyone does), it’s not the most valuable way to actually use your support team’s skills.
Why? Glad you asked.
It’s always good to remember that your support team is juggling a lot more than you think because there’s so many different types of requests that come through. One of those requests that takes a lot of time is, you guessed it, return requests. While these are important, they don’t exactly require a human touch since they’re very straightforward and focus heavily on process.
If your support team isn’t able to address other requests in a timely manner, that could mean losing new customers or returning ones because of those support tickets.
Luckily, return-requests can be easily automated.
It may come as a surprise to hear that your customers don’t actually want a high touch support experience for returns from your team. They actually want to be the ones to choose where and when they want to engage with support teams.
Since customers want a more on-demand experience when it comes to returns and something that happens fast, automation doesn’t hurt in these scenarios since it can be quick.

Bringing Loop and Gorgias together for a seamless customer experience that saves your team time is like a dream come true.
But how exactly, can this address the issues we’ve been discussing?
First off, this partnership will allow your support team to use that extra time in valuable ways that make sense and benefit the business. For example, focusing more on new customers, shipping issues and more.
Secondly, it benefits your customers since it allows them to take control of their returns and do things on their own time. This makes it more seamless and makes them feel like the return process is easier than ever.

Using both Loop and Gorgias together will create a better environment all around, decreasing stress both within your support team and customers so that your team can focus on conversions instead of returns.
Whether you’ve been looking for a way to reduce your support requests related to returns, or if it’s something new on your radar, it’s worth thinking about. Thankfully, you can sign up for a free 7-day trial with Gorgias and add in the Loop integration to see just how much time it can save.

TL;DR:
Zendesk's pricing starts at $19/agent/month for basic ticketing and scales to $169/agent/month for enterprise omnichannel support. But advertised rates rarely tell the full story, as add-ons and implementation costs push total ownership higher.
This guide breaks down Zendesk's plan tiers and true costs so you can budget accurately. We'll also show you where transparent, ecommerce-focused alternatives might be a better fit.
{{lead-magnet-1}}
Zendesk uses per-agent pricing across 2 main product lines: Support (ticketing only) and Suite (omnichannel). Plans range from $19 to $169/agent/month depending on features and channels.
Each person on your support team needs a paid seat. As you hire, your software costs scale directly with headcount. This means a 10-person team pays 10 times what a single agent pays, and a 50-person team pays 50 times that amount.
Annual billing saves roughly 20% compared to monthly. For example, Suite Team costs $55/agent/month annually versus $69/agent/month on monthly billing. The model itself is straightforward:
Support plans focus on ticketing for email and social channels (X, Facebook). They lack phone, chat, and Help Center capabilities.
Suite plans bundle ticketing with live chat, voice, messaging, and a self-service help center. This is Zendesk's omnichannel option.
Choose Support if you only need email ticketing. Choose Suite if customers contact you across multiple channels.
Per-agent pricing means your bill grows with your team. A 10-person team on Suite Professional pays $1,150/month. A 50-person team pays $5,750/month. Understanding the marginal cost of customer service becomes critical at this scale.
Annual billing reduces costs by roughly 20%. Suite Team drops from $69/month to $55/month per agent. Monthly billing costs more but lets you test Zendesk before committing. Useful for seasonal hiring or pilot programs.
Customer Service plans provide ticketing, automation, and reporting for email and social channels. They're Zendesk's entry point but lack phone, chat, and Help Center.
Price: $19/agent/month (annual) or $25/agent/month (monthly)
Features:
No phone, chat, or Help Center. Best for very small teams handling email only.
Price: $55/agent/month (annual) or $69/agent/month (monthly)
No phone, chat, or Help Center. Best for very small teams handling email only.
Price: $115/agent/month (annual) or $149/agent/month (monthly)
Features:
Still lacks voice and chat channels. Requires Suite upgrade for omnichannel.
Price: $169/agent/month (annual) or $219/agent/month (monthly)
Features:
Maximum Support tier but still email-focused. Consider Suite for full channel coverage.
Employee Service plans include ticketing plus live chat, voice, messaging, and a help center in one package. These plans are designed for scaling teams.
Each tier includes a set number of Help Centers (1, 5, or 300). Multi-brand businesses may hit this limit.
Price: $29/agent/month (annual) or $39/agent/month (monthly)
Features:
Single Help Center limits multi-brand setups. Basic AI only.
Price: $59/agent/month (annual) or $79/agent/month (monthly)
Features:
Still limited to basic AI. Advanced AI requires $50/agent/month add-on.
Price: $115/agent/month (annual) or $149/agent/month (monthly)
Features:
Good for mid-market but still requires add-ons for full AI capabilities.
Price: Hidden, must speak to sales for a quote
Features:
Highest tier but add-ons still required for full AI, WFM, and security features.
Base plans don't include all AI and specialized features. Add-ons cost $25-50/agent/month each and compound quickly across your team.
A 10-agent team adding Advanced AI ($50) and WFM ($25) pays an extra $750/month beyond base plan costs.
Price: $50/agent/month
Must purchase for all agents. No selective assignment.
Example: 10 agents = $500/month additional cost
Price: $35/agent/month for conversation analysis, agent coaching, and performance tracking
Available across all plan tiers. Useful for larger teams managing schedules and quality.
Price: $25/agent/month for scheduling, forecasting, and capacity planning
Available across all plan tiers. Useful for larger teams managing schedules and quality.
Price: $50/agent/month
Available across all plan tiers. Useful for larger teams managing schedules and quality.
Ideal for regulated industries like healthcare and finance.
Price: $50/agent/month
Powered by Amazon Connect, this add-on allows teams to manage calls, contacts, recordings, and transcriptions.
Advertised prices rarely reflect the true cost. Implementation, training, and add-ons push total cost of ownership higher. This ultimately impacts your customer service return on investment (ROI).
Hidden costs include:
Small team (5 agents): Starts with Suite Team ($55/agent/month = $275/month). Adds Advanced AI ($50/agent) for holiday rush. Total jumps to $525/month, nearly double.
Mid-market team (20 agents): Needs Suite Professional ($115/agent) plus AI ($50) and WFM ($25). Total: $3,800/month or $45,600/year.
Enterprise (50 agents): Full add-on stack (Suite Enterprise $169 + AI $50 + WFM $25 + QA $35 + Data Privacy $50). Total: $329/agent/month or $197,400/year.
Optimal plan varies by team size, channel needs, and budget. Here's what makes sense for different segments.
Recommended: Support Team ($19/agent) if email-only. Suite Team ($55/agent) if you need chat or phone.
Considerations:
Recommended: Suite Professional ($115/agent) for omnichannel, SLAs, and analytics
Considerations:
Recommended: Suite Enterprise ($169/agent) with full add-on stack
Considerations:
Zendesk's per-agent pricing with add-ons can exceed alternatives that include more features in base plans.
Freshdesk starts at $15/agent/month with omnichannel included. Transparent pricing, no hidden add-ons.
HappyFox starts at $29/agent/month with unlimited agents on higher tiers. Better for scaling teams.
Kustomer uses session-based pricing instead of per-agent. Better for high-volume, lower-complexity support.
Ecommerce brands often choose Gorgias for Shopify-native features, transparent pricing, and included AI capabilities without per-agent add-ons.
Pricing models compared:
When Zendesk makes sense:
When to consider alternatives:
Zendesk's pricing works for large organizations with complex needs and dedicated budgets. But the per-agent model with mandatory add-ons pushes total costs higher than many teams expect. For ecommerce brands, platforms built specifically for online retail often deliver better value with clearer pricing.
Still looking for a helpdesk? See how Gorgias delivers transparent pricing and ecommerce-specific features. Book a demo.
{{lead-magnet-2}}

TL;DR:
Most teams searching for Zendesk alternatives have already hit one of three walls: a bill that keeps climbing, a setup that never feels finished, or a support ticket to Zendesk that went nowhere.
Zendesk's base pricing is just the start. AI features come with per-resolution fees of $1.50-$2.00 that seem small until you're handling thousands of tickets a month. A busy support team can easily spend twice what comparable alternatives cost once those fees stack up. Others aren't leaving over cost at all: they need ecommerce workflows Zendesk doesn't support natively, or they want a tool their agents can use without six weeks of setup.
This guide ranks 20 Zendesk alternatives based on pricing, AI cost transparency, setup time, and ecommerce fit.
The right Zendesk alternative depends on your team type. Here's a quick breakdown before we dive into the full reviews.
Team Type |
Recommended Alternative |
Starting Price |
Ecommerce brands |
Gorgias |
$10/month |
Small teams & startups |
Help Scout |
$25/user/month |
SMBs wanting full features |
Freshdesk |
$15/user/month |
Budget-conscious teams |
Zoho Desk |
$23/user/month |
SaaS companies |
Intercom |
$29/user/month |
HubSpot users |
HubSpot Service Hub |
$90/user/month |
High-volume ecommerce |
Kustomer |
Custom pricing |
Collaborative teams |
Front |
$25/user/month |
Enterprise on Salesforce |
Salesforce Service Cloud |
$25/user/month |
IT & DevOps teams |
Jira Service Management |
$19/user/month |
Zendesk built its reputation on robust ticketing, extensive integrations, and enterprise-grade reliability. But as the platform has evolved, three friction points have driven teams to evaluate alternatives: escalating costs with unpredictable AI fees, administrative complexity requiring dedicated expertise, and support responsiveness that doesn't match premium pricing.
Zendesk's per-agent pricing starts at $55 USD/user/month (Suite Team) and reaches $115 USD/user/month (Suite Professional), but the base cost is only the beginning. AI features require separate add-ons priced at $50/agent/month plus $1.50-$2.00 per resolution. For a 50-agent team with moderate AI usage (3,000 resolutions/month), total monthly cost reaches $8,900 compared to alternatives at $3,000-$5,000/month.
There are more additional costs. Training programs often exceed $2,000, consultant fees for setup run $150-$300/hour, and Premier Support adds 20-35% of your annual contract value with floor minimums that price out smaller teams.
One Reddit user noted, "It took me 3-4 weeks to learn Zendesk, another 3 weeks to build our workflows, plus a full week migrating data. I could've launched two other tools in that time."
Zendesk's complexity demands technical expertise for triggers, automations, and workflow configuration. Teams report setup timeframes of six to eight weeks compared to alternatives: Help Scout (hours), Gorgias (minutes for basic setup), Freshdesk (one to three days). This time gap translates directly to delayed productivity and dependency on external consultants or dedicated admins.
Zendesk doesn't offer 24/7 support on any tier, including the highest plans. Premier Support, available as an add-on at 20-35% of annual contract value, still falls short of competitor standards. G2 reviews consistently mention bot-first chat support and difficulty reaching human agents for technical troubleshooting.
Alternatives like Gorgias and Help Scout include 24/7 support on base plans without add-on fees, with faster response times and higher satisfaction scores.
Zendesk fragments customer conversations: tickets live in Zendesk while order details, purchase history, and product catalogs remain in separate systems. Support agents manually switch between platforms to process refunds, cancel orders, or view customer lifetime value.
Ecommerce-focused alternatives like Gorgias and Kustomer embed order context directly in ticket view, enabling agents to issue refunds, modify subscriptions, and recommend products without leaving the conversation. This reduces handle time and improves personalization for product-driven support inquiries.
We assessed 20 platforms across five core criteria, prioritizing pricing transparency, ecommerce depth, AI cost predictability, setup speed, and reporting flexibility. Tools with "pricing upon request" scored lower on transparency. Here's how we weighted each factor:
We evaluated base pricing (per-agent vs flat/unlimited models), AI add-ons (per-resolution vs included), setup/training costs (consultant fees, onboarding programs), and migration fees. Platforms requiring custom quotes or hiding AI costs behind sales calls ranked lower for transparency. We calculated total cost of ownership over 12 months for a 20-agent team to enable apples-to-apples comparison.
We assessed coverage across email, chat, social (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter/X), SMS, and voice channels. For ecommerce fit, we tested integrations with Shopify, BigCommerce, and WooCommerce, checking whether platforms enable order management actions (refunds, cancellations, edits) within the helpdesk interface. We also reviewed customer data sidebars for visibility into order history, lifetime value, and past interactions.
We compared AI pricing structures: flat per-agent (predictable monthly cost), per-resolution (variable cost tied to usage), and session-based (charged per conversation initiated). We tested AI accuracy on common support queries (WISMO, returns, and cancellations), measured deflection rates, and evaluated escalation logic. Platforms with transparent, predictable AI costs scored higher.
We measured time from signup to first live ticket, categorizing platforms as hours, days, or weeks. We assessed whether implementation requires consultants or supports self-implementation by non-technical users. We evaluated the agent learning curve using G2 ease-of-use scores and the availability of onboarding resources like templates, guides, and training modules.
We tested real-time dashboard availability, custom report building without SQL/coding, and SLA configuration flexibility (per-channel, per-tag, per-VIP tier). We also checked scheduled report delivery, data export options, and API access for custom analytics workflows.
Tool |
Starting Price |
AI Pricing Model |
Setup Time |
Best For |
G2 Rating |
Gorgias |
$10/month |
Flat (included) |
Minutes |
Ecommerce brands |
4.6/5 ⭐ |
Freshdesk |
$15/user/month |
Session-based |
1-3 days |
SMBs |
4.4/5 ⭐ |
Help Scout |
$25/user/month |
Per-resolution ($0.75) |
Hours |
Small teams |
4.4/5 ⭐ |
Intercom |
$29/user/month |
Per-resolution ($0.99) |
1-2 days |
SaaS startups |
4.5/5 ⭐ |
HubSpot Service Hub |
$90/user/month |
Included (Pro+) |
3-5 days |
HubSpot users |
4.4/5 ⭐ |
Zoho Desk |
$23/user/month |
Included (Zia AI) |
2-4 days |
Zoho ecosystem |
4.4/5 ⭐ |
Kustomer |
Custom pricing |
Flat per-agent |
2-4 weeks |
High-volume ecommerce |
4.4/5 ⭐ |
Front |
$25/user/month |
Add-on ($20/user) |
Hours |
Collaborative teams |
4.7/5 ⭐ |
LiveAgent |
$9/user/month |
Included |
1-2 days |
Budget-conscious SMBs |
4.5/5 ⭐ |
HappyFox |
$24/user/month |
Flat add-on ($14/agent) |
Hours |
IT/operations teams |
4.5/5 ⭐ |
Gorgias is a conversational commerce platform built for ecommerce brands. Unlike general-purpose helpdesks, Gorgias embeds Shopify order data, product catalogs, and customer purchase history directly into every ticket. Support agents can issue refunds, cancel orders, and recommend products without leaving the conversation.

Best for: Shopify and BigCommerce merchants who need order management actions within their helpdesk, AI that can execute real support workflows (not just answer questions), and a platform that drives revenue through personalized product recommendations.
Limitations: Not ideal for non-ecommerce businesses or teams requiring ITSM/ITIL workflows.
Key features:
Pricing: From $10/month; AI Agent included on all plans with flat pricing (no per-resolution fees)
G2 rating: 4.6/5 ⭐
{{lead-magnet-1}}
Freshdesk is an all-in-one helpdesk offering ticket management, automation, and omnichannel support at a lower price point than Zendesk. Freshdesk is known for its easy setup and clean interface, which reduces agent training time.

Best for: Small to mid-market teams wanting Zendesk-like features without the complexity or cost.
Limitations: Advanced AI and reporting features require higher-tier plans; session-based AI billing can become unpredictable at volume.
Key features:
Pricing: Free plan available; paid plans from $15/user/month; Freddy AI: 500 sessions free, then $49/100 sessions
G2 rating: 4.4/5 ⭐
Help Scout is a shared inbox platform designed for teams who want support to feel personal, not transactional. Every interaction looks like a regular email, and the interface is so intuitive that most teams are productive within hours.

Best for: Teams of 5-15 agents where brand voice and relationship quality matter more than advanced automation.
Limitations: Limited automation depth; not built for high-volume operations or multi-department ITSM needs.
Key features:
Pricing: Free plan available; Standard from $25/user/month
G2 rating: 4.4/5 ⭐
Intercom is a messaging-first platform that combines live chat, AI chatbots, and proactive outbound campaigns. Fin AI resolves up to 50% of inquiries by pulling from your knowledge base and past conversations.

Best for: SaaS companies needing AI-driven deflection and in-app messaging for onboarding and support.
Limitations: Costs can escalate quickly with seat charges plus per-resolution AI fees; less flexible for traditional ticketing workflows.
Key features:
Pricing: From $29/user/month; Fin AI at $0.99/resolution
G2 rating: 4.5/5 ⭐
HubSpot Service Hub integrates natively with HubSpot CRM, giving support agents access to full customer context including sales interactions, marketing engagement, and deal history. It's best for teams already using HubSpot across their stack.

Best for: Organizations using HubSpot CRM across sales and marketing who want unified customer data without manual syncing.
Limitations: Costs increase quickly as you scale; outside the HubSpot ecosystem, equivalent features are available at lower cost elsewhere.
Key features:
Pricing: Free plan available; Professional from $90/seat/month
G2 rating: 4.4/5 ⭐
Zoho Desk is one of the most affordable Zendesk alternatives, offering workflow automation, AI assistance (Zia), and omnichannel support at a fraction of the cost. It's particularly strong for teams already using Zoho CRM or other Zoho products.

Best for: Budget-conscious teams in the Zoho ecosystem who need robust automation without enterprise pricing.
Limitations: Interface can feel cluttered; advanced automation and reporting require Professional plan or higher.
Key features:
Pricing: Free plan available; Professional from $23/user/month
G2 rating: 4.4/5 ⭐
Kustomer is a CRM-powered helpdesk that unifies customer data from every touchpoint into a single timeline view. It's designed for high-volume support teams that need deep customer context and advanced automation.

Best for: Ecommerce and subscription businesses with complex customer journeys requiring unified data across support, sales, and marketing.
Limitations: No transparent pricing published; requires demo and custom quote; can be overkill for smaller teams.
Key features:
Pricing: Pricing upon request
G2 rating: 4.4/5 ⭐
Front transforms your inbox into a collaborative workspace where teams can assign conversations, leave internal notes, and work together on customer replies in real time. It's built for teams where email is the primary support channel.

Best for: Customer success and account management teams where collaboration depth and shared email ownership matter more than traditional ticketing.
Limitations: Not ideal for high-volume ticketing or structured SLA enforcement; AI features require separate add-ons.
Key features:
Pricing: From $25/user/month; AI add-ons priced separately
G2 rating: 4.7/5 ⭐
LiveAgent is a full-featured helpdesk with particular strength in live chat and call center support. Unlike many competitors, AI features are included across all plans without extra fees.

Best for: SMBs where live chat and phone are primary channels and budget is a constraint.
Limitations: Dated UI; mobile app and analytics customization lag behind modern competitors.
Key features:
Pricing: From $9/user/month
G2 rating: 4.5/5 ⭐
HappyFox blends traditional helpdesk features with ITSM-lite capabilities like asset tracking and change management. It's known for quick setup (often under an hour) and a low learning curve.

Best for: Mid-market IT and operations teams needing structured workflows without full ITIL complexity.
Limitations: No free plan; total costs can add up as you scale; limited for highly customized workflows.
Key features:
Pricing: From $24/user/month
G2 rating: 4.5/5 ⭐
Jira Service Management is built for IT and DevOps teams who need tight integration between support tickets and engineering work. Bugs reported through support can be linked directly to Jira Software without switching tools.

Best for: IT and engineering teams in the Atlassian ecosystem needing ITIL-aligned incident and change management.
Limitations: Steeper learning curve for non-technical teams; more complex than necessary for customer-facing support.
Key features:
Pricing: Free plan available; Standard from $19.04/agent/month
G2 rating: 4.4/5 ⭐
ServiceNow Customer Service Management is an enterprise-grade platform offering advanced workflow automation, AI-powered routing, and deep customization. It's typically deployed by large organizations with dedicated ServiceNow administrators.

Best for: Global enterprises with complex service operations requiring extensive customization and ITIL compliance.
Limitations: Requires significant implementation effort (often 3+ months); expensive; overkill for most mid-market teams.
Key features:
Pricing: Pricing upon request
G2 rating: 4.2/5 ⭐
SolarWinds Service Desk is a cloud-based ITSM solution designed for IT teams managing internal service requests, incidents, and asset tracking. It follows ITIL best practices and integrates with SolarWinds' broader IT management suite.

Best for: IT departments needing a dedicated service desk for internal ticketing and asset management.
Limitations: Not designed for customer-facing support; limited omnichannel capabilities.
Key features:
Pricing: From $39/month
G2 rating: 4.4/5 ⭐
Kayako differentiates through customer journey tracking, showing agents the full history of a customer's page visits, past conversations, and interactions before responding. It's designed for teams where personalized, context-aware service matters more than ticket volume throughput.
Best for: Mid-sized teams focused on real-time chat and personalized service delivery.
Limitations: Limited integrations; can feel limiting as operations scale.
Key features:
Pricing: $79/month flat (Kayako One); AI add-on at $1/resolved ticket
G2 rating: 4.0/5 ⭐
Groove is a lightweight shared inbox that mirrors the feel of an email client, making it extremely easy for small teams to adopt. It includes the core essentials (shared inbox, ticketing, automation) without overwhelming users with unnecessary features.
Best for: Startups and small businesses (under 15 agents) that want a complete helpdesk without complexity.
Limitations: Basic reporting and filtering; limited scalability for high-volume operations; fewer integrations than larger platforms.
Key features:
Pricing: From $24/user/month
G2 rating: 4.6/5 ⭐
Salesforce Service Cloud is the enterprise option for organizations already running Salesforce CRM who need unified data across support, sales, and marketing. It offers the deepest CRM integration in this comparison but requires dedicated Salesforce administrators to manage.

Best for: Global enterprises with existing Salesforce infrastructure needing unified customer data and advanced customization.
Limitations: Expensive ($25,000-$100,000+ in professional services for implementation); steep learning curve; not practical without dedicated admins.
Key features:
Pricing: Starter Suite from $25/user/month; Professional from $80/user/month; Einstein Bots from $75/user/month add-on
G2 rating: 4.4/5 ⭐
Published pricing is just the starting point — here's what you actually need to budget for.
Most platforms charge per-agent pricing: cost multiplies with every new hire. This model works for stable teams but becomes expensive as you scale. Flat or unlimited pricing — like HappyFox and some Zoho Desk plans — charges a fixed monthly cost regardless of agent count.
Worth calculating: HappyFox unlimited at $1,999/month vs. Zendesk Suite Professional at $115/agent/month hits breakeven at 18 agents. Above that threshold, unlimited pricing saves money. Below it, per-agent costs less.
AI pricing varies widely across platforms:
For 3,000 AI resolutions/month, Zendesk's resolution fees alone run $4,500–$6,000. Per-resolution and session-based models create budget risk as usage scales — flat-rate AI eliminates that variability.
Calculate total first-year cost including base pricing, AI fees, setup, training, and migration to compare true TCO.
Not every team needs to switch. Zendesk works well for large enterprises with dedicated support ops teams, technical expertise in-house, and budgets that accommodate premium pricing. But specific triggers make alternatives worth evaluating.
Per-agent pricing compounds as teams scale. Adding 10 agents on Zendesk Suite Professional costs an additional $13,800/year, while alternatives like Zoho Desk ($23/agent) or Freshdesk ($15-19/agent) reduce that same expansion to $1,800-$2,280/year. HappyFox offers unlimited agent plans at flat monthly rates, eliminating per-agent costs entirely.
When to switch: If you're planning to add 5+ agents in the next 6 months, calculate total cost over 12 months across platforms. The savings typically justify migration effort.
Zendesk doesn't natively support Shopify order actions, forcing agents to toggle between platforms. Customer data lives separately from tickets, creating friction for order-related inquiries (WISMO, returns, cancellations). Ecommerce-focused alternatives like Gorgias and Kustomer embed order actions and product recommendations directly in ticket view, reducing handle time and improving personalization.
When to switch: If support agents spend more than 30% of their time on order-related inquiries, or if you need revenue tracking per conversation, ecommerce-first platforms deliver measurable efficiency gains.
CX and internal IT support (ITSM) require different workflows. CX prioritizes omnichannel coverage, conversation history, and personalization. ITSM demands asset tracking, change management, and ITIL compliance. Zendesk bridges both but excels at neither.
When to switch: If more than 80% of tickets are internal IT requests requiring asset tracking or ITIL workflows, ITSM-focused alternatives like Jira Service Management or SolarWinds offer better fit at lower cost.
The best Zendesk alternative depends on your team size, use case, and budget. Here's a quick guide before you commit:
Take advantage of free trials and demos. The fastest way to evaluate a platform is to run a real support workflow through it. And look beyond base pricing: AI fees, setup costs, and migration time all affect your first-year total.
Switching from Zendesk to Gorgias? Explore our buyout program for full access to Gorgias features at no initial cost, or book a demo to see it in action.
{{lead-magnet-2}}

A quick look into BigCommece, and you'll quickly see one of the main advantages about
As eCommerce-Aholic says in their YouTube video: 5 reasons to choose BigCommerce over Shopify, when deciding whether a SaaS ecommerce platform is right for you, you have to consider APIs.
Because more often than not, you don’t have access to the underlying code fuelling your ecommerce website.
This is where APIs come into their own.
In short, API stands for 'Application Programming Interface.' This enables two apps to communicate with each other. As such, this is what allows you to extend the overall functionality of your chosen ecommerce platform.
With that in mind, let’s delve into this subject a little deeper.
BigCommerce's API coverage is incredibly impressive. As is the number of API calls that BigCommerce can process per second. In fact, it can handle 100 times more API calls per second than Shopify Plus!
Shopify limits you to just two API requests a second, or four API per second if you’re a Shopify Plus user. Whereas BigCommerce can handle a whopping 400 API calls per second!
Let’s take synchronizing your entire stock list with BigCommerce’s Catalog API as an example. This API enables you to integrate your BigCommerce store with your POS and multiple online sales channels...so that you can handle everything from a single platform. Needless to say, this makes selling on popular third-party platforms like Amazon, Walmart (Jet), Wayfair, Best Buy, Houz, etc. a breeze!
So, suppose you’re running a large enterprise and have thousands of items to synchronize (or have tons of different product options). In that case, 25,000 products could take over four hours to sync on Shopify! Whereas, with BigCommerce, that same volume of merchants would take around a minute.
Following this same logic, if you're syncing multiple systems with your ecommerce store, you’ll be thankful that BigCommerce handles so many API calls per second. After all, there are only so many hours in the day!
The biggest perk?
But, that isn't the best thing about BigCommerce's APIs. In fact, it's the real-time information your shipping and logistics partners feedback to your store that's of the most value.
Of course, this also has a knock-on effect on the quality of your customer support. Slow and unreliable API calls adversely impact your store's inventory levels and shipping updates for customers.

While we're on the topic of customer service, just think of the kind of high-quality customer support you could provide, using one of your many APIs to connect your BigCommerce store with Gorgias.
You'll be able to offer all the following at lightning speed:
On top of the obvious benefits listed above, you can also use BigCommerce's API points to create mobile apps using data retrieved from your online store. Not only does this make app development much easier, but ultimately, it'll also provide a seamless experience for the end-user. Win-win!
For the sake of ease, we've listed some of the different kinds of BigCommerce APIs you can use and how they could benefit your online store. Hopefully, this provides some much-needed inspiration for making the most out of your abundance of APIs.
Storefront APIs: This enables you to manage customer carts and checkouts (from the client's side and your back end). For instance, you can add products to a shopper’s cart, gather and display customer order info, update billing addresses, and erase current e-shopping trolleys.
GraphQL Storefront API: Similar to above, you can also use this API to access your customer's product info and modify customer details and orders. But more unique to this API, you can build frontend apps. This permits you full control over the look and feel of your brand.
Scripts API: You can insert any scripts for analytics, single-click apps, live chat, support plugins, and theme extensions for any apps or integrations you’ve downloaded, so you'll no longer have to manually paste code into your control panel.
Widgets API: Here, you can create modular blocks of content to reuse wherever you want. Similarly, you can also develop tools to empower non-techy users to manage your content. Trust us, your team will thank you for not making them go to the trouble of modifying the theme files.
Payments API: As its name so aptly suggests, this API facilitates the acceptance of customer payments. You can create custom checkouts either using a Server-to-Server Checkout API Orders endpoint or via the V2 Orders endpoint.
First off, you need to obtain the API credentials.
From there, you can experiment with your APIs using BigCommerce's in-built 'Request Runner.' Here, you just copy and paste your store_hash, client_id ID, and access_token.
Then once you've done that, hit 'Send.'
Alternatively, you can use the REST Client extension to make API requests, using the Visual Studio Code. Once you've installed this extension, you'll need to create a new file called BigCommerce.http.
Then you'll need to paste the following:
@ACCESS_TOKEN = your_access_token
@CLIENT_ID = your_client_id
@STORE_HASH = your_store_hash
###
GET https://api.bigcommerce.com/stores/{{STORE_HASH}}/v3/catalog/products
X-Auth-Token: {{ACCESS_TOKEN}}
X-Auth-Client: {{CLIENT_ID}}
Content-Type: application/json
Accept: application/json
Now, hit 'Save.'
This should trigger a 'send request' link to display above GET. Click 'send request,' and the API response will appear in a split window.
There are other ways to start using BigCommerce APIs, but we don't have time to go through them all in this article. Hopefully, this has been enough to help steer you in the right direction. For more information, take a look at BigCommerce’s API documentation.
We hope having read this article, you have a better idea of what you could achieve with BigCommerce's generous API allowance. The BigCommerce API lets you sync inventory across channels, and locations, connect to apps, and offer exceptional customer support. How have you used the BigCommerce API?

For most retailers, Black Friday is the busiest and most profitable day of the year. However, not everyone is into shopping on Black Friday. Every year, more and more activists are protesting the consumer culture by celebrating ‘Buy Nothing Day.’
Never heard about it? Although the anti-consumerism celebration has been gaining traction in the last couple of years, it’s still not well-known among the general public.
How did we come to this point? That’s what we’ll learn today.
You’ll find out:
{{lead-magnet-1}}
As high-speed Internet spread across the planet so did Black Friday. What initially started as a mall craze has evolved in an online phenomenon. But do you know how Black Friday started? When and where did it happen and how did it spread?
The holiday got started in the early-50s, in Philadelphia. The term was used to describe the heavy traffic on the day after Thanksgiving when hordes of tourists and suburbanites would storm the city in advance of the annual Army-Navy football game.
While we don’t know for certain, the term “Black Friday” was possibly coined by the members of the Philadelphia police department to describe the shoplifting, traffic jams, and general mayhem. Yes, Black Friday incidents are nothing new.
Even though retailers tried to change its name to “Big Friday” during the late 60s in an effort to avoid the negative connotations, the original name persevered. In the mid-80s, marketers started using the term in connection to “being in the black” after a financially bad year.
Black Friday sales became commonplace across the United States, in the early 90s. By the mid-2000s, online shopping started gaining traction. In 2008, online shoppers spent $534 million on Black Friday.
During the same period, Cyber Monday got its start. The holiday took off when the staff at Shop.org noticed a 77% increase in online sales on Monday after the Black Friday weekend. Since Cyber Monday was so successful, some of the largest store chains in the US, like Walmart and Amazon merged the two into a single shopping weekend.
Soon after, retailers started creating different spin-offs of the Black Friday/Cyber Monday weekend. For example, the day after Black Friday is called Small Business Saturday. That’s why some retailers now celebrate Black November all month long.

Last year, retailers from all over the world saw more than 93 million people shopping online, during the Black Friday weekend. While a huge number of people are looking forward to the holiday, there are some that aren’t as nearly excited.
The holiday has its positive and negative sides. Some of the Black Friday pros include:
Of course, we need to take into consideration Black Friday cons as well:
{{lead-magnet-2}}
Not all people see Black Friday as a great opportunity to buy that 40-inch smart TV for a fraction of its price. Some see it as nothing more than a decadent celebration of commercialism. That’s why some people opt to celebrate Buy Nothing Day.
Never heard of Buy Nothing Day before? You’re not alone. A lot of people haven’t. But don’t worry, we’re here to explain everything…
Now, Buy Nothing Day is actually nothing new. The anti-holiday was originally thought out by a Canadian artist by the name of Ted Dave way back in 1992. His anti-shopping campaign started gaining steam once it got picked up by the non-profit magazine, Adbusters.
According to the official Adbusters website, the day is meant for ordinary consumers to re-examine their spending habits and take a look at the “issue of overconsumption.”
During the 90s and 00s, this anti-holiday was mainly “celebrated” in the US and Canada, but in the last couple of years, thanks to the Internet, it reached a worldwide audience. While it’s certainly not popular as Black Friday, it’s slowly catching on.
Seeing how Buy Nothing Day is still new, it’s no wonder that different people celebrate it in different ways. However, over the last decade, certain traditions have developed. Here a few universal ways in which people celebrate Buy Nothing Day:

People who are preoccupied with the negative aspects of commercialism are obviously more likely to participate in the Buy Nothing Day celebration. But just like its consumerism-celebrating counterpart, Buy Nothing Day has its negative and positive sides.
Let’s go over the positive aspects first:
Nothing is perfect and Buy Nothing Day isn’t the exception. Here are some negative aspects:
As a retailer, are you wondering if you should be worried? Can Buy Nothing Day turn some of your customers against you, destroy your relationship, and hurt your sales? Let’s see how the BFCM weekend will stack up against Buy Nothing Day in 2020.
Consumers have become more conscious in recent years. They’re more worried about global problems than ever before, and they would like the companies they’re dealing with to share their concerns.
But if overspending in rampant consumerism is such a problem, why isn’t Buy Nothing Day bigger? You have to remember that the day is competing with well-established holidays. Also, Black Friday backlash has been much more noticeable outside the US.
For example, just last year in France, protesters gathered in an attempt to block an Amazon warehouse in the suburbs of Paris. In other European countries, lawmakers are considering banning Black Friday altogether, due to the negative environmental impact.
Speaking of France, a collective known as MFGA (Make Friday Green Again) recently formed in the country, in order to help the citizens become more conscious about their consumption. More than 450 brands signed up to support the MFGA initiative in 2019.
Faguo, the organization behind the movement is inviting consumers to drop unwanted clothing items into their stores and encouraging consumers to take part in their tree-planting campaign.
In the United States, REI, an outdoor-gear manufacturing company is doing its part to slow-down overconsumption during the BFCM weekend. On Black Friday, the REI officials close all of their stores, give their employees a paid day off, and encourage people to go outside for a walk, hike, or a campaign trip.
Their Opt Outside campaign not only helps their consumers become more physically active and financially responsible, but also spreads awareness about their values. The fact that the healthy activities they promote are what their products are made for is not a coincidence.
Will Black Friday sales suffer from Buy Nothing Day? Not really. While some will choose to ignore the BFCM weekend, most people are either not aware of Buy Nothing Day or don’t feel like they have any trouble controlling their spending.
Large stores probably won’t feel any consequences. However, their small-to-midsize counterparts might feel the hit.
Around 60% of all online spending during BFCM goes to a dozen or so large retailers. None of them will feel the impact of Buy Nothing Day. The rest of the money goes to thousands of small stores. They’re the ones that could potentially feel the hit.
Should you be concerned about Buy Nothing Day? Yes and no. On one hand, you have to be aware that as a small business owner, you can’t afford to lose any customers. On the other, it’s not likely that many of your customers will choose Black Friday to ignore you.
There’s a simple solution if you feel like Buy Nothing Day may be a problem. To get the younger, socially-aware crowd on your side, you just have to show them that you care.
You can use your website to encourage people to spend more time outdoors or promote a good cause. Take DoneGood for example. In 2018, the Boston-based ecommerce website donated Black Friday revenue to the RAINN foundation.
It took nearly 50 years for Black Friday to become a worldwide phenomenon. Although information travels fast nowadays, it’s not realistic to expect for Buy Nothing Day to become a large-scale protest against consumerism any time soon.
When done right, Black Friday can be a great day for both retailers and shoppers. If you’re a store owner and you want to make it great for your customers, here’s what you need to do:
One thing is certain: your customers should always come first. You need to show them that you share their values, respect their concerns, and that you’re ready to take that extra step to keep them satisfied. And you can’t do that without a good helpdesk.
With Gorgias helpdesk, you can attend to your customers, establish, and nurture relationships with ease.
Go ahead, sign up for Gorgias, get your 15-day free trial, and see your customer satisfaction rates skyrocket.

As many of you already know, Gorgias has spilled their blood, sweat, and tears into creating the best customer support platform on the market.
BUT...
We want to provide our customers with more.
More value. More possibilities. And, most importantly, more opportunities to grow and scale your online business.
...Enter our new show Vested Interest.
Like Shark Tank and Dragons Den, Gorgias is partnering with venture capital companies, including Greycroft, Swiftarc, and Rosecliff. You guessed it...successful applicants have the chance to pitch investors and receive valued feedback and advice. Pitching helps brands boost their profile, and may even lead to a second conversation with an investor.
So, in honor of our exciting new initiative, in this blog post, we're delving into ecommerce fundraising in more detail. More specifically, what it is, why you should consider it, and how to raise those all-important funds to transform your business dream into reality.
Does that sound good to you? Fab! Continue reading to find out more...
First things first, we want to clarify what ecommerce fundraising actually is. In short, it's the process online merchants take to secure the funds they need to launch and/or grow their ecommerce businesses.
Traditionally, business fundraising was associated with start-ups, brick and mortar stores, and scaling companies to reach new heights.
But, fast forward to today, more and more DTC brand owners and online merchants are also leveraging capital to launch and/or expand their business.
And there's no reason you can't do the same.
Of course, there are several ways to raise business capital, but some of the more popular routes include:
As we've just said, there are plenty of other fundraising avenues, but for the purposes of this article, we're focusing on these.
Let's explore the options above in a little more detail...
Seeking funds from an angel investor(s) might be the ideal option if you're running a small ecommerce brand that's generating steady profits. I.e., without external funding, you're doing okay. Still, to take your business to the next level, you need a cash injection.
This is where an “angel” investor might come in handy.
Typically speaking, angel investors are wealthy people, or groups, who pool their know-how, research, and resources to provide promising start-ups capital.
Generally, angel investors give companies some sort of financial assistance in exchange for either convertible debt (i.e., the promise of converting part (or all) of the loan into common shares, at some point in the future) or ownership equity.
Usually, you'll approach an angel investor with a pitch outlining who your business is, how much money you want to secure, and what you hope to achieve with their finances.
As the size of angel investments substantially varies (usually anywhere under $50,000 to over $500,000), you'll have to prove how you'll provide reliable results. You need to show investors why your business is worth their time, and more importantly, money. After all, it stands to reason, if you can prove your brand will go the distance, the safer bet you are for them to invest in.
Then, after your initial meeting(s) with the angel investor(s), they'll typically go away and conduct their own research, ask you questions, etc. to help determine whether your proposition is a good fit with their investment portfolio.
In short, crowdfunding is where a wider pool of small-time investors assist a company during its earlier stages. As crowdfunding is typically used to accumulate funds to launch, these businesses often have a minimal (if any) track record of their profits. As such, this fundraising method is ideal for those with a killer business idea, without the financial forecasts to wow angel investors, banks, or venture capital firms.
There are tons of crowdfunding sites online. For instance:
These are just a few of the many online crowdfunding platforms on the web. But, the ones above are a great starting point - here, you can get your brand and business plan in front of loads of people actively looking to invest in fledgling businesses.
Crowdfunding relies on your ability to inspire trust and enthusiasm in your audience. Show them you've done your research and are prepared to put their money to good use. This means breaking up your estimated costs and demonstrating where the money will go. For instance, how much is allocated to production, how much on design? Showing you understand your costs improves your credibility.
Whatever crowdfunding platform you choose to use, post regular updates, and answer questions. Show the community that's building around your idea that you care for their involvement. Investing in a crowdfunding project can be daunting, some investors might fear that you won’t come through. So, demonstrate from the start that you're reliable and fully invested in putting their worries at bay.
Last but not least, make sure your crowdfunding campaign is well presented. Where possible, use high-quality graphics and video content. Proofread your proposal, ensuring all the info is shown in a way that's logical and easy-to-read. Get friends and family to check over your campaign description for you. Professionalism goes a long way in inspiring the confidence of potential investors!
Securing investment from venture capital firms like Greycroft, Swiftarc, and Rosecliff, is (usually) better suited to larger online enterprises. For the uninitiated, 'venture capital' is a form of private equity and financing that investors provide businesses with long-term growth potential.
Entrepreneurs typically secure this kind of financing from affluent investors or investment banks. But, it's worth noting that venture capital doesn't always take a monetary form. Venture capital can also be provided as technical or managerial expertise.
As investments go, plowing money into an ecommerce business is one of the riskier options. But, the potential for above-average returns is enticing, so we're seeing more and more investors adding online brands to their investment portfolio.
However, the main drawback for brand owners is that investors usually get equity in the company. As such, you'll give up the luxury of having full control over your business's operation. You don't need us to tell you that this a big deal. So, take your time weighing up the pros and cons of any investment agreement before signing the dotted line!
Equity investors do precisely what they say on the tin. They're people who provide companies with financial investment in exchange for a share of the business's ownership.
Generally, equity investors don't get a guaranteed return on their investment. But, should the company be liquidated, the equity investor will get a share of the assets (as stipulated in your contract).
Unsurprisingly, as equity investment is a riskier option for investors, they often expect to receive certain benefits to offset these risks. For instance, your investment agreement might stipulate that their initial investment is paid back within a specific time frame. Then, afterward, it's common for investors to be paid a pre-agreed share of the profits once you've paid back their initial investment.
Alternatively, (or as well as) equity investors can receive stock shares. Of course, stocks rise and fall depending on the market. So, again their return on investment isn't set in stone. But, the investor has the luxury of selling their stocks on the stock market or via other trading platforms, whenever they feel like it. So, be sure to bear that in mind while you're drafting up your agreement.
Of course, the more traditional route for securing funding is to apply for a small business loan with a bank or other reputable lending institution.
If this is an avenue you're considering, you'll want to know why business loans get rejected to increase the likelihood of securing your requested funds.
Interestingly, the most common reason cited for why business loans are rejected is 'risk.' This is why thoroughly preparing before meeting to discuss (or applying) for a potential loan is imperative. You want to do your utmost to show you’re ‘low risk.’
Part of this planning phase will be gathering the below details and documents:
As you go about creating your business plan, focus on explaining why the small business loan you're asking for is a low-risk proposition. Be sure to carefully assess how much money you need and why. Outline how you'll spend these funds, and how the loan will specifically help you launch and/or grow your business.
Be prepared to explain how you'll designate every dollar you've asked for, with specific reference to your business's following aspects:
You'll also need to explain how you'll repay the loan through your financial statements and cash flow projections. This should highlight to the potential lender that you're able to repay them over a set amount of time.
Revenue-based financing is sometimes referred to as royalty-based financing, so don't let the interchangeable terminology confuse you. Both terms mean exactly the same thing!
In short, revenue-based financing is a method businesses use to raise capital from investors. In turn, the investors receive a percentage of the company's regular gross revenue until a pre-set amount is paid (in exchange for their original investment). Typically, this sum is three to five times the initial investment. Companies like Clearbanc charge a flat fee for their capital. Uncapped is also another fantastic example of a revenue-based financing company.
Essentially, organizations offering revenue-based financing use data-driven methods to provide ecommerce companies with funding. Capital is typically spent on online marketing and inventory. The best thing about this kind of arrangement for the entrepreneur is that there aren’t any credit checks, personal guarantees, warrants, or covenants involved.
Whether you're leveraging angel investors, an equity investor, or the help of a venture capital firm, there's one significant advantage.
These kinds of investments are (usually) nowhere near as risky as taking out a bank loan. Unlike a loan, (depending on the contract you have with your investor(s)), invested capital doesn't typically have to be paid back if your business flops.
Plus, most experienced investors understand that they're playing the long game. So, there isn't quite as much pressure to make quick decisions and turn high profits immediately.
If you don't like the idea of losing some (or even complete) control of your business, then seeking the support of investors might not be the best option for you. Often investors become part-owners of your company, so depending on their share, there's a good chance they'll have a say about how you run your business. On top of that, should you ever sell your business, they'll also receive a portion of the profits.
For this section of the blog post, we're mainly focusing on angel, venture capital, and equity investors.
When it comes to raising capital to fund an ecommerce brand, there are specific times in the business cycle when you're more likely to secure funding.
Yes, your best bet is to seek investment when you're actually ready to grow your business. But, securing financing, especially from an angel investor, can take roughly six months to a year.
So, it's advisable to start contacting and pitching investors roughly 12 months before you actually need the funds to boost your business to its next phase.
Not only will this increase the likelihood of securing funding for when you actually need it, but for every failed pitch (yes, sadly, there will be failures), you'll benefit from those all-important pointers.
The more investors you talk with, the more apparent it becomes what investors want to see from your company and your business plan before they're happy to invest.
With this info to hand, you're then in a better position to adapt your business (and your pitch), to meet the needs of investors, when you actually need the funding.
Typically, you'll kickstart your relationship with an investor by presenting a business plan. Do your utmost to wow them from the get-go, so they'll only be telephone a call away when you need capital.
As we've just said, if you're preemptively pitching investors before your business is fully investor-ready, the investor will probably point you in the right direction.
You can then go away and mull over this information and make the necessary changes to increase the chance of them investing in your business in the future.
The best thing to do is to write a full business plan. The most important thing for lenders is what they'll get from the arrangement. As we've already hinted at, you'll want to highlight your expected financial projections. This serves as much-needed bait for enticing investors into funding your business.
We talked about business plans a bit earlier. However, they're essential to securing funding, so we're delving a bit deeper into creating a killer business plan (of course, this advice also applies if you're considering a bank loan)...
Here are a few tips:
Don't be tempted to be overly optimistic about where your profit forecasts are concerned. Yes, this might up your chances of securing the desired finances. Still, in the long run, you're more likely to suffer from a cash flow crisis and damage your management credibility. Put simply, it's not worth it - stick to the truth.
Also, ensure your business plan looks as professional as possible. Show the lenders you're taking their investment seriously! So, put a cover on it, include a contents page complete with page numbering, and kickstart your proposal with an executive summary.
For those unsure what an executive summary is, it's just a condensed synopsis of the key points covered in your business. The reader's digest version if you will.
On top of that, you'll also want to highlight the following details:
As you go about creating your pitch, familiarize yourself with your audience. You want to know your potential lenders inside out and back to front to tailor your pitch accordingly.
Yes, specific metrics (like your current profits and profit forecasts) lay the framework for any pitch. Still, you'll need to tailor your core messaging to appeal to each investor's needs.
The key takeaway: Do your homework and modify your presentation accordingly.
Last but not least, remember business financing is a process. It's likely you'll have to divide your financing objectives into two to three rounds. Securing funds for your business when it's brand-new, (and all risk), and has very little revenue behind it, is more of a challenge.
So, when you first start out, you're unlikely to obtain all the money you need to launch and scale your business. But, once you have a working prototype and a loyal customer base, you'll take away some of the risks, and as such, you'll probably secure more funds. Prepare for this in advance by dividing your business's growth into specific sections that you raise funds for accordingly.
There are tons of examples of ecommerce brands furthering their business by raising capital. Take Womenswear retailer, Hush, as an example. Hush sells women’s clothing, shoes, and lifestyle items. Currently, it's retailing its products via its website, its partnership with John Lewis.
But, recently, they've secured investment from a private equity firm, True. Hush, now worth over 50 million dollars, plans to utilize these funds to expand into new sales channels and markets.
True acquired a controlling interest in Hush, (roughly a 50% stake). This is what the owners of Hush had to say about the investment:
“We never thought [Hush] would get to a fraction of the size it is,” “We could have carried on [without outside investment], but we felt...real value in bringing in a partner with a similar vision to us, but different skills, to help us grow.”
Interestingly, this is what True had to say about investing in Hush:
“We think highly profitable, predominantly direct-to-consumer brands such as Hush...will emerge in [good] shape from this current crisis – and completing the transaction now demonstrates that we’re very much open for business and excited about the opportunity ahead of us.”
If you're considering crowdfunding avenue, below are a few brands that smashed their targets. Hopefully, these examples will fuel you with inspiration:
Pebble successfully raised $10.3m, when their target was just $100k!
This is what they had to say about the process:
“We had a pretty firm idea of what Pebble would look like. We just didn’t have a bunch of cash to start actually building the product. So, we thought of some other ways to get funding, and one of them was Kickstarter."
These are interactive toy robots that help teach kids how to code. Product owners, Play-i, managed to raise a whopping $1.4 million when their initial aim was just $250k.
Play-i successfully attracted investors from dozens of countries around the globe, securing 11,000 pre-orders! Interestingly, this company utilized crowdfunding to test the market and get a feel for consumer demand, having already secured $1m from Google Ventures.
How did Play-i manage to entice so many crowdfunding investors?
In short, they provided various benefits to their first buyers:
“We needed to build social proof right off the bat, so we created special perks for the first few buyers. Our first 1,000 backers got limited edition, exclusive outfits for their robots as an incentive to back early. We emailed our existing audience and friends several hours before our campaign went live [to] be among the first to back the project. This gave us the momentum we needed to get off to a good start.”
The team at Play-i also responded personally to all their audience interaction - every email, comment on Facebook, query on Twitter, etc. It stands to reason investors and customers feel more confident in your brand when they have a personal connection with you and your business. By taking the time to write customized responses to each and every person who wrote them, they ensured people got excited about their product!
OpenaCase is described as the 'world’s most functional iPhone case is a bottle opener.'
The ecommerce brand managed to raise an impressive $283k, massively exceeding their $150k target.
This is what the founders had to say about the crowdfunding process:
“We didn’t have the capital, so we turned to crowdfunding... When we put the idea on Kickstarter, we realized... lots of people loved the idea and were willing to put money towards it to make it happen. [There's] Nothing better than having your idea validated by people voting with their wallets.”
They attracted attention to their crowdfunding campaign by creating a Facebook page, and contacting online publications like Tech Crunch and Gizmodo, that's as well as their local paper. They spent lots of time cultivating as much possible PR to gain the traction they needed to raise those all-important funds.
We hope that having read this article, you now have a better idea about raising the funds you need to take your ecommerce brand to the next level.
As we said from the get-go of this article, Gorgias wants to help ambitious e-commerce brands scale up, so we created the Vested Interest event. If you're interested in securing finances from high-quality investors, then what are you waiting for? Apply today to get the ball rolling! If you have any questions about the show, please feel free to reach out, and we'll furnish you with all the info you need. Speak soon!
2020 has seen two crisises so far. Because of the global pandemic, millions of people lost their jobs. We've responded with a plan to offer free credits to businesses that struggle.
George Floyd's death is showed us again how deep racism still is in the US and around the world. Gorgias is committed to supporting members of the Black community against racism, prejudice, and hate.
We're actively taking measures to make a difference now, and tomorrow:
We realize this is only a small contribution to a big problem, but change has to start somewhere. We see lots of businesses take action so we hope the sum of all these initiatives will lead to long lasting change.


